"God save us from people who mean well."

— Experience
(and Vikram Seth, apparently)

  • 8 hours ago

The Question of Attribution. 'If something is not what it claims to be, what is it'?

Sir Anthony: Even the most brilliant forgery, in time, comes to seem old-fashioned.
The Queen: Interesting. I suppose too, a context of the painting matters - its history and 'province', is that the word... 'This can't be a forgery, it's in such and such a collection, its background and pedigree are impeccable. Besides it has been vetted by the experts', isn't that how the argument goes? So if anyone comes across a painting with the right background and pedigree, sir Anthony, it must be hard I imagine, even inconceivable to think that it's not what it claims to be. And even supposing that someone is such circumstances did have suspicions, they would be chary about voicing them. Easier to leave things as they are - stick with the official attribution, rather than let the cat out of the bag and say 'yeah, we have a fake'.
  • 1 day ago
  • 1

"I think, today’s irony ends up saying: ‘How totally banal of you to ask what I really mean.’ Anyone with the heretical gall to ask an ironist what he actually stands for ends up looking like an hysteric or a prig."

  • 1 week ago
  • 20
  • 3 weeks ago

"

The essence of genius as a modality is that it seems to reverse the logic of excellence.

Needless to say, the spectacle of an individual moving against his or her expert community away from carrots and towards sticks is generally viewed as a cause for alarm independently of whether that individual is a malfunctioning fool or a genius about to invalidate community groupthink.

We have spent the last decades inhibiting such socially marginal individuals or chasing them to drop out of our research enterprise and into startups and hedge funds. As a result our universities are increasingly populated by the over-vetted specialist to become the dreaded centers of excellence that infantilize and uniformize the promising minds of greatest agency.

In the wake of the Challenger disaster, Richard Feynman was mistakenly asked to become part of the Rogers commission investigating the accident. In a moment of candor Chairman Rogers turned to Neil Armstrong in a men’s room and said “Feynman is becoming a real pain.” Such is ever the verdict pronounced by steady hands over great spirits.

"

Eric R. Weinstein
“What should we be worried about (?): Excellence”.

  • 1 month ago

We wise young things in daisy fields.

-

Credits to wonderful authors:
Marta Soltys & ada blitzkrieg.

  • 1 month ago
  • 1
  • 2 months ago
  • 282
  • 2 months ago
  • 6
  • 2 months ago

Arvo Pärt

  • 2 months ago
  • 14

From “Vulgarity in Literature” by Aldous Huxley

“It was vulgar at the beginning of the 19th century to mention the word ‘handkerchief’ on the French tragic stage. An arbitrary convention had decreed that tragic personages must inhabit a world, in which noses exist only to distinguish the noble Romans from the Greeks and Hebrews, never to be blown.

Artistically, the abolition of handkerchiefs and all that handkerchiefs directly or indirectly stand for has certain advantages. The handkerchiefless world of pure mind and spirit is, for an adult, the nearest approach to that infinitely comfortable Freudian womb, toward which, as toward a lost paradise, we are always nostalgically yearning.

In the handkerchiefless mental world we are at liberty to work things out to their logical conclusions, we can guarantee the triumph of justice, we can control the weather and (in the words of those yearning popular songs which are the national anthems of Wombland) make our Dreams come True by living under Skies of Blue with You.

Nature in the mental world is not that collection of tiresomely opaque and recalcitrant objects, so bewildering to the man of science, so malignantly hostile to the man of action; it is the luminously rational substance of a Hegelian nature-philosophy, a symbolic manifestation of the principles of dialectic. Artistically, such a Nature is much more satisfactory (because so much more easy to deal with) than the queer, rather sinister and finally quite incomprehensible monster, by which, when we venture out of our ivory towers, we are instantly swallowed.



The world of mind is a comfortable Wombland, a place to which we flee from the bewildering queerness and multiplicity of the actual world.

Matter is incomparably subtler and more intricate than mind.

Or, to put it a little more philosophically, the consciousness of events which we have immediately, through our senses and intuitions and feelings, is incomparably subtler than any idea we can subsequently form of that immediate consciousness.”

  • 3 months ago

"Hence it comes that all armed prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed prophets have been destroyed."

— Niccolo Machiavelli

  • 4 months ago
  • 4 months ago
  • 18